Iowa River Corridor Trail
Run Time: 66:51 + 2:30 kick

I just finished reading Rebecca Traister’s Good and Mad for our family book club. I have notes in my phone to share with the chat members as soon as some of them read Part 1, so I don’t want to share too many details of the book, other than what we have done to women in the past 150 years is beyond the pale, to understate matters exponentially. And the past 150 years is the best we’ve come up with so far, tragically.

A lot of what I read dovetails with a story idea that’s been bouncing around in my head for a year or so. Actually, it started when I realized that no one has written a sci-fi novel titled 2084. I know I’m risking losing that idea to another writer by mentioning this in a blog post, but I’m hoping my 13 subscribers won’t sell my idea to a better writer.

That idea entered my radar, and I started trying to create an outline, mostly around climate change. The challenge with science fiction, especially now, is predicting what might happen. Accuracy is not that important. Uniqueness is. If you read science fiction written in the 20th century, not many writers were predicting the advent of the smart phone. What keeps those works in the public consciousness is not how well the writer predicted the future, but how interesting the story is to the reader.

I was doubting my ability to come up with a clever take on the future. It’s tempting to take the post-apocalyptic approach. It’s also tempting now to take the world-too-hot approach. One of my outline segments had people living on islands off the Southern Alaska coast, which were now moderate in terms of weather but problematic due to sea level rise.

And then I started thinking about a scheme that I used to write a short novel that I’m just now finishing up, about a girl who starts playing high school baseball in the early 2000s. That project started with me thinking, when we moved to Utah in 2021, that it might be fun to get a job coaching high school baseball. That idea morphed into a much better idea: write about coaching high school baseball. When you write a story, you literally control the narrative. What happens is what you want to happen, which is nothing like real youth sports.

That approach worked well. What happens in the story is what I want to happen. Not what I think would have happened. Not what should have happened. I didn’t try to capture reality. Well, what type of story is more ripe for that approach than science fiction?

Instead of writing what I think the world will be like in 2084, I can write what I want the world to be like in 2084. Obviously, that is a Utopic novel (because I want the world to be amazing in 2084), but it seems like most novels about “Utopia” end up being cautionary tales, like 1984, for instance. Or Brave New World. It’s a theme often repeated: be careful what you wish for; you might get it. You think it’s Utopia, but it’s Dystopia.

Why not write about a real Utopia? Like one where climate change gets solved, and reparations are made, and optimal health is achieved, and humans live in equilibrium with all other life. It’s been said that the best way to predict the future is to create it. Instead of predicting the future, why not imagine what we want? Or what I want, at least. We’re not crowd-sourcing this work. Not at this point anyway.

I swear I came up with all of this before I read Good and Mad. If so many of our problems as a species can be attributed to Patriarchy, what would be one of the most effective ways to fix those problems? How about eliminating the male gender? It’s only 2026, so I think we can let those of us alive now go peacefully (most of us anyway — there are some candidates for immediate termination). And I swear, in this story, there’s not going to be a conclave of evil men who somehow survive and emerge to wreak retribution. The project is to imagine what the world would look like in 2084 with no men.

One of my favorite writers, Lyz Lenz, lives in Iowa, not far from Coralville, I think. She’s also a runner. I was kind of hoping I would bump into her along Corridors of the Iowa River, and I could share this story idea with her. She could be a key advisor. She could point out the irony of this story being written by a man. Maybe she could help me figure out how to weave some humor into this narrative. Maybe she would remark that this all sounds like a way for me to reconcile my awakening to the horror of how women are treated in this world by trying to control it, which is a key flaw in Patriarchal reasoning.

This is actually my favorite part of writing: coming up with the idea. The writing itself tends toward drudgery for me. I am much more comfortable when I have a lot of things going on, like my crappy job, so that I can pop in and “write” for 15 minutes and feel like I’m justified not hunkering down to write 3000 words.

I have plenty of time to write 2084 without hunkering. Orwell published 1984 in 1949. But… he was only 46 years old when it was published. And he died the next year. The clock ticking for me now is not the clock of finishing the novel before someone else publishes a science fiction novel with the same title. It’s the clock of my mortality, when I vacate this world and contribute to the dream of a world without men.































































































